Receipts / Learn / "I was just joking": how humor is used to disguise criticism and control

"I was just joking": how humor is used to disguise criticism and control

The comment stung. You know it did. But before you could even process what was said, the framing was already in place: it was a joke. You're supposed to laugh. And if you didn't laugh - if you flinched, or went quiet, or said "that wasn't funny" - now there's a new problem. Not the thing that was said, but the fact that you can't take a joke.

This is one of the more disorienting patterns in relationships, because it exploits something that's supposed to feel safe. Humor is connective. It's intimate. It's one of the ways people build closeness. Which is exactly why it works so well as a delivery system for things that would be harder to say directly.

When someone uses "I was just joking" consistently - not as a genuine apology for a joke that missed, but as a shield against accountability for what the joke actually communicated - it's worth paying attention.

The structure of the "just joking" pattern

The pattern has three parts, and all three are necessary for it to function.

First, the comment. It contains criticism, contempt, a boundary violation, or a put-down. It might target your appearance, your intelligence, your competence, your past, or something you're sensitive about. The content is pointed, not playful.

Second, the delivery. It's wrapped in humor - said with a laugh, a smirk, an exaggerated tone. This is the packaging that makes it socially acceptable and difficult to challenge without seeming humorless or fragile.

Third, the defense. When you react to the content rather than the packaging, the response reframes your reaction as the problem: "Relax, it was a joke." "You're so serious all the time." "Can you not take a joke?" Now the conversation is about your inability to handle humor, not about what was said.

How it shows up in messages

The insult with a smiley face

Text messages make this pattern particularly clear because the content and the delivery exist in the same visible format. There's no tone of voice to soften the words - just the words themselves, often followed by an emoji or "lol" that's doing heavy lifting.

Them: Wow you actually cooked tonight? Should I be worried lol

You: That's kind of rude

Them: Babe I'm kidding. You know I love your cooking. Sometimes. Haha

You: It just didn't feel like a joke

Them: You take everything so seriously. I was being playful. Sorry I'm not allowed to have fun anymore

You named what the comment felt like. The response didn't reconsider the comment - it reframed your reaction as excessive and positioned your boundary as a limitation on their freedom. "Sorry I'm not allowed to have fun anymore" turns accountability into victimhood.

The public put-down

This version uses an audience - friends, family, a group chat - to increase the social pressure to laugh along.

Them: [in group chat] Just so everyone knows, it took [You] forty minutes to parallel park today. Might need to start taking the bus lol

You: [privately] Hey that embarrassed me. Can you not do that in front of people?

Them: It was funny. Everyone laughed. You laughed too

You: I laughed because I didn't know what else to do

Them: I think you're overthinking this. It's not a big deal. I make fun of myself all the time

The public setting matters. When criticism is delivered as humor in front of others, challenging it means risking looking sensitive in front of the group. So you laugh. And later, that forced laugh gets cited as evidence that you were fine with it. See how blame shifting works for more on how your response gets used as evidence against your own feelings.

The escalation over time

What makes this pattern particularly worth tracking is how it changes. Early in a relationship, the humor might be light and the put-downs minor - small enough to genuinely seem like jokes. Over time, the comments often get sharper, more personal, more frequent. The targets shift from surface-level teasing to things that matter to you - your insecurities, your family, your competence.

Month 2: Them: Nice outfit. Very... bold choice lol

Month 5: Them: You're wearing THAT? Haha ok I guess

Month 9: Them: My friends think it's hilarious how long you take to get ready considering the results lol. I told them you try hard and that's what counts

The same basic structure - criticism wrapped in humor - but the intensity has shifted. Month two is ambiguous. Month nine is contempt. And if you've accepted the framing of "it's just a joke" for months, challenging it now feels inconsistent. You've been "fine with it" until now, so what changed?

What changed is the pattern escalated. And you can see it when you look at the messages laid out over time.

Why this pattern is hard to challenge

The "just joking" defense is effective because it creates a lose-lose situation for the person on the receiving end. If you laugh, the comment stands and the behavior is reinforced. If you don't laugh, you're "too sensitive" and the conversation becomes about your reaction rather than the original comment.

This means the criticism gets delivered either way. The only variable is whether you also have to defend yourself for noticing it.

Over time, this teaches a specific kind of self-silencing. You stop calling out comments that bother you, not because they've stopped bothering you, but because the cost of saying something is higher than the cost of absorbing it. You develop a tolerance for language that hurts you, and you start to wonder if maybe you are too serious, too sensitive, too unable to take a joke.

If your partner's humor consistently targets you - your appearance, your intelligence, your worth - and the response to your discomfort is always that you're the problem, that's not humor missing the mark. That's a pattern.

Seeing the pattern in your messages

Individual jokes exist in a gray area. Tone is ambiguous. Intent is debatable. But patterns aren't. When you can see six months of messages and track what gets joked about, how the comments land, and what happens when you push back, the picture becomes clearer.

Receipts can help by analyzing your message history to identify patterns in how humor is used within your conversations - tracking whether "jokes" consistently target specific insecurities, whether the "just kidding" defense shows up predictably when you express discomfort, and whether the intensity of these comments has changed over time. It's a way to see the dynamic laid out plainly, without having to rely on memory that's been shaped by months of being told you can't take a joke.


If you need support

If you're experiencing a crisis or are in immediate danger, please call 911.

  • National Domestic Violence Hotline: 1-800-799-7233, available 24/7
  • Crisis Text Line: Text HOME to 741741
  • Hot Peach Pages: hotpeachpages.net - international directory of domestic violence resources

You don't have to be in an emergency to reach out. These resources are available if you need someone to talk to.

Get early access

Be among the first to use Receipts. We are rolling out access gradually to ensure quality and safety for every user.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Your email is never shared.